
You could say the title of
this blog reads like a mystery novel and in a way that is exactly what a
mensuration canon is. More on that later. First I shall set the scene.
France, Flanders and the
Netherlands was home to several
prominent composers in the second half of the fifteenth century. One of these was Jean de Ockeghem, one of the leading
composers in the Renaissance period. He was born in approximately 1420 in Hainaut, North-eastern
France and was a member of the Royal Chapel of Charles I, Duke of Bourbon,
becoming a priest in about 1464. He followed in the footsteps of Du Fay, was a
contemporary of Busnoys and produced a relatively small number of works despite
his renown. He was revered for his masses whilst Busnoys was esteemed for his
many chansons. Together they were acclaimed as “the most outstanding and most famous professors of the art of music”
by Tinctoris.
Ockeghem wrote 13 masses, a Requiem
Mass, 21 chansons and at least 5 motets. Many of his chansons, as well as
Busnoys’s were extremely popular and appeared regularly in manuscripts in many
other countries. At this time compositions were often rearranged, transcribed
for instruments or used as the basis for other composers’ works.
As with Busnoys’s music,
Ockeghem’s music featured a mixture of old and new styles. They retained the
use of forms fixes, syncopated rhythms,
dissonances and the use of thirds and sixths from the previous generation but introduced
a more equal use of the different voice parts. They also began to use four
voice parts: the cantus or superius, the altus, the tenor and the contratenor
or bassus. They also made changes to the vocal ranges for each voice part.
“Through these changes Ockeghem creates a fuller,
darker texture than we find in Du Fay’s works.” A History of Western Music, 9th Edition.
(Burkholder, Grout and Palisca)
Ockeghem’s Missa Prolationum is a great example of
this and he contrasts upper and lower voices in pairs as well as writing some
sections as trios or duets. It is notated for two voices but sung in four
parts. This image shows an example of the original score.

It uses the four prolations of
mensural notation, these being either Major or Minor prolation in Perfect or
Imperfect time, thus dictating the time signature each part should be sung in. Two
parts coming from one notated line is called a canon and, depending on which
prolation they are following; they sing the same melody at a different time. This
is where we come back to the mystery I spoke of earlier. To quote my lecturer,
it is “hidden in the same way as the perfect
crime.” As the parts interweave at their differing speeds it is almost
impossible to tell which voice is singing the melody as it is so cleverly
written with mathematical precision. This is known as a mensuration canon; in fact,
it is also a double canon as each of the originally notated two lines is sung
in canon. Clever stuff indeed. These canons were greatly valued by musicians
for being ingenious and extremely skilful and many enjoyed trying to solve the
mystery from written scores for themselves. Here is a YouTube clip of the Missa Prolationum with the score.
Embrace you inner Hercule Poirot and see if you can figure it out.
Very informative! Francis will be quite honored you quoted him :P Love the last sentence, I wonder how many people will get it hehe. :)
ReplyDeleteThanks Daniel, for the comment and testing that the comments settings now work. Glad you got the connection. :-)
Delete